|
STROJNÉ
INŽINIERSTVO 2000
15.
NOVEMBER 2000
STROJNÍCKA
FAKULTA STU BRATISLAVA |
|
Dagmar
Szarková* - Kamil Maleček**
*Department of
Mathematics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Slovak
University of Technology
E-mail:
szarkova@sjf.stuba.sk
**
Department of Mathematics, Civil Engineering Faculty,
Czech
Technical University
E-mail:
kamil@mat.fsv.cvut.cz
Abstract
In
this paper a general geometric definition of a projection is
introduced. We will work in detail with the projection, where the
plane stands for the image surface and lines forming the
congruence of lines in 3-D space are projecting curves. The basic
distribution to linear and quadratic projections is introduced
with their further classification. In this paper analytic
representations of projections suitable for computer processing
are derived. Views of a single machine part in different types of
projections produced by means of computer are shown.
I.
Generally about projection
Let
r be a
two-dimensional surface in the extended Euclidean space E3.
Any
mapping P
of the space E3
onto the surface r is called a
projection. The surface r is called an
image surface. The point X’ is the image of the point X,
if X’
= P(X),
X’Îr .
In
geometry we introduce the projection P
in this way:
Let
us define the system S of curves,
while any s, s Î S
will by denoted as a projecting curve. The system S has the following
properties:
i)
One and only one curve sX, sXÎS
is passing through almost any point XÎE3,
sX is the
projecting curve of the point
X .
ii)
Any projecting curve has one and only one common point with
the image surface.
The
point X’ is an
image of the point X
in a projection, when the point X’
is an intersection point of the projecting curve s
of the point X with
the image surface r.
The
domain of definition of the projection P
is the set of all points X,
which have the image in the projection.
The
projection is determined by the image surface r
and by the system of projecting
curves. The choice of the image surface r
and system of projecting curves gives different types of
projections. The most frequently used projection is the one, where
the image surface r
is a real plane and projecting curves are lines. The
reasons are obvious. Any line s,
s Ër,
has one and only one point in common with the plane
r in the space E3.
We will use this projection only, in the following.
II.
Projection P(r,
a, b)
In
the Euclidean space E3,
let us choose two different lines a,
b
that are not located in the image plane r.
Let the projecting line be any line intersecting lines a
and b. This projection will be
marked P(r, a, b).
According
to mutual position of lines a,
b we get the following
types of projections
P(r, a, b):
1.
Linear projection
The
lines a, b
have one and only one common point S,
S r
and therefore they determine the plane w.
The domain of definition is D(P)
= E3 –
{w}.
a)
If the point S = a
Ç
b is a finite point,
then a projecting line of any point X
w is
the line SX. Let the
projecting lines of the points XÎw,
X S
are also lines
SX . Then we speak about central projection with the centre
S . The domain of
definition is D(P)
= E3 –
{S}.
b)
If the point S
= a Ç
b is a point at infinity,
then the projecting line sX
of any point
X w
is
the line SX . Let the
projecting lines of points XÎw,
X S
are
also lines SX . Then we
speak about parallel projection with the direction s
= sX. The
domain of definition is
D(P)
= E3
– {S}.
2.
Quadratic projection
The
lines a, b
are two skew lines. The projecting line of the point X
(X a
X b)
is the line passing through the point X and intersecting both skew lines a, b .
The domain of
definition is D(P)
= E3
– {a
b }. This projection is
called quadratic projection. The image in the quadratic projection
will be denoted as quadratic view.
The
quadratic projections can be also classified similarly as the
linear projections mentioned above:
a)
both lines a, b
are real lines,
b)
the line a is the
real line and the line b
is the line at infinity, the latter being determined by the real
plane b not parallel to the plane r and
intersecting the line a
.
J.
Klíma studied the quadratic projection [1] , which is
closely connected to the congruencies of lines. He named it the
net projection. The notion quadratic projection is probably more
proper because generally the image of a line is a conic section.
It is therefore evident that a computer can more precisely
construct the quadratic view of any object.
III.
Analytic representation of quadratic projection in the
space E3
In
the Euclidean space E3 let us
choose a Cartesian coordinate system O, x, y, z
so that the projection plane r be
the plane yz. Let
the point X Î D(P)
have the coordinates [x, y, z]
and the point X’
with coordinates [x´, y´, z´]
be its image.
a)
Let the line a
be determined by the point A = [xA, 0, 0]
and by the direction vector a = (xa, ya, za) .
The line b will be
determined by the point B = [xB, 0, 0]
and by the direction vector b = (xb, yb, zb) .
The
projection defined in this way has the analytic representation
|
x´
=
0
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
b)
Let the line a
be determined by the point A = [xA, 0, 0]
and by the direction vector
a = (xa, ya, za)
. The line b will be
line at infinity determined by the direction vector
b = (xb, yb, zb) and
by the point B,
which is the point at infinity determined by the vector (xB, yB, zB) .
Analytic
representation of this projection is
|
x´
=
0
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
Now
we will introduce two particular examples of a quadratic
projection and we will present quadratic views of a simple machine
part under these projections.
Example 1:
The
line a is determined by
the point A = [20, 0, 0]
and by the direction vector a
= (0, -1, 1).
The
line b is determined by
the point B = [10,
0, 0] and by the direction vector b = (0, 1, 1).
We
obtain from equations (1) the analytic expressions
(3)
|
|
The
quadratic view of the machine part under this quadratic projection
is shown in Figs.1a and 1b.
|
|
Fig. 1a. |
Fig. 1b. |
Example 2:
The line
a is determined by the point A
= [20, 0, 0] and by the direction vector a
= (0, -1, 1) (see example
1). The line b is the
line at infinity and it is determined by the plane xy
. We obtain the analytic representation (4) of this
projection from the equations (1)
(4)
|
|
In
Figs. 2a and 2b there is the quadratic view of the machine
part.
|
|
Fig. 2a. |
Fig. 2b. |
References
[1]
Klíma,J.: Různé způsoby zobrazovací v DG, Cesta k vědění
sv.27, 1944. |